Federal Marriage Amendment Re-introduced in Senate

[Fort Myers]

Riverjames wrote:

<quoted text>so is hetersexual marriage, ever watch divorce court? If you guys can't get it right, you shouldn't have a problem with us trying it.

And maybe the beastophiles too? I don't think so.

[Fort Myers]

Riverjames wrote:

<quoted text>What an a**hole you are. Heterosexuals have contracted it at a faster rate than homosexuals, and children are dying at a faster rate as well.

Prove it.

[Light Sensitive]

if a law could ACTUALLY strengthen human relationships you anti-gays might have leg to stand on, but since there is zero way a law is going to do that...we have reality. you cant legislate human behavior like this, nor should we. Should we sanctify Milk and Cookies next, as an American Institution...? the backbone of the society's snacking...? maybe ketchup on a burger only and not on hotdogs should be sanctified...?

The Right Wingnuts have done a nice job of making this sanctity of marriage charade a piece of legislative welfare...and is making more of a farce out of it than permitting two people to engage in a human relationship ever would...

[Light Sensitive]

Fort Myers wrote:

<quoted text>
Prove it.

prove him/her wrong...!

ever hear of a little place called Africa?
Eastern Europe...?

[Alg2772917]

victoria1 wrote:

<quoted text>
I can...
Gay Pride week brings $100 million in revenue to city of Toronto
http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_24295.aspx
BEAT THAT WITH A STICK

And how does a gay pride parade in Canada affect the pocket books of the average American?? The truth is it doesn't so now we have to waste all this tie and money for something that shouldn't be an issue. Simple solution open the existing anti discrimination laws add "sexual orientation" to the list of groups that can't be discriminated against problem solved

[Alg2772917]

Hoyt wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course, idiot. We'd all have to pay for the discriminatory benefits and subsidies.
Why not forget homosexual "marriage" and deal with real issues?
Homosexual "marriage" is a fraud. It is only a political charade.
No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron. In Belgium, Spain, and South Africa, for example, fewer than 1/2 of 1% of homosexual has "married." Participation in the Netherlands, where it all began, has been in a complete nosedive since the initial political charade began.
Homosexual "marriage" is a cruel lie.

subsidies for marrige LMAO here did you get that weiner savage

[writewingproxyco ntin]

Fort Myers wrote:

<quoted text>
Prove it.

Go to the CDC website, you talibangelical bigot. Oh, I forgot, you don't "believe in" science - and the earth is 6k years old. Right? Sorry you have nerve endings around your an us and it makes you feel funny - don't take it out on us, Cletus.

[writewingproxyco ntin]

Roe wrote:

No significant percent of homosexuals has "married" in ANY country that permits the oxymoron. In Belgium, Spain, and South Africa, for example, fewer than 1/2 of 1% of homosexual has "married." Participation in the Netherlands, where it all began, has been in a complete nosedive since the initial political charade began.

You got your britches in quite a fix over such an insignificant event then, Cletus.

BTW, you incesting, constapo hillbilly folk need to remember that lying is against the Tin Commodements.

[Fort Myers]

Light Sensitive wrote:

<quoted text>
prove him/her wrong...!
ever hear of a little place called Africa?
Eastern Europe...?

The OP must prove itself although Africa does not report homo/hetero statistics. "Eastern Europe" is too vague.

[Fort Myers]

writewingproxycontin wrote:

<quoted text>
Go to the CDC website, you talibangelical bigot. Oh, I forgot, you don't "believe in" science - and the earth is 6k years old. Right? Sorry you have nerve endings around your an us and it makes you feel funny - don't take it out on us, Cletus.

CDC reports homosexual AIDS is MUCH higher per capita then heterosexual AIDS.

That was way too easy.

[victoria1]

Alg2772917 wrote:

<quoted text>And how does a gay pride parade in Canada affect the pocket books of the average American?? The truth is it doesn't so now we have to waste all this tie and money for something that shouldn't be an issue. Simple solution open the existing anti discrimination laws add "sexual orientation" to the list of groups that can't be discriminated against problem solved

I was talking about the average Canadian, more revenue into our city, for housing, child care, healthcare, etc...

Same sex marriage is legal in this country, and as you can see we are going strong.

Only a matter of time before the US catches up to us.

[writewingproxyco ntin]

Fort Myers wrote:

<quoted text>
CDC reports homosexual AIDS is MUCH higher per capita then heterosexual AIDS.
That was way too easy.

Lying does come too easily to you, but neither good xstains nor accomplished trolls should ever need to lie.

First, the AIDS trope you rely on has nothing to do with moving to marriage equality and full rights, troll, it has to do with your bigotry.

The CDC links to the UN AIDS organization. 35 million or so HIV/AIDS cases worldwide and about 23 million of those are in sub Saharan Africa. It's largely women and children. AIDS is overwhelmingly a disease of heterosexuals.(Even in the US it is getting really close to a majority str8 disease; about 50/50. I never said anything about per capita.)

tinyurl.com slash 4f2cbs

Now stop flossing with your banjo strings and go back to incesting your daughters, Jethro.

[1noteasilyfooled]

Alg2772917 wrote:

<quoted text>subsidies for marrige LMAO here did you get that weiner savage

I like this poster!

[1noteasilyfooled]

Patrick wrote:

<quoted text>
Victoria, if this is the same person as from a year ago, there is no point in arguing. He pulls statistics out of thin air and never backs them up. The more you argue, the dumber he gets.
Don't feed the trolls!

Wil is wil and will always be wil..

Same drivel, different year..(different name every 15 minutes)

[Roku Roku Roku]

Geo wrote:

<quoted text>
HIV/AIDS remains a majority homosexual disease in America, according to official CDC statistics. Why you fanatics spend millions on the fraud of homosexual "marriage," young homosexuals remain the largest category of new infection.
Lying about it doesn't help. You have blood on your hands!
As for marriage, no homosexual relationshit shares the reasons for government involvement in marriage, and real equality means we all have an equal voice in defining marriage. You loose. Most Americans oppose your contrived oxymoron.

Equality means the state of being equal, esp. in status, rights and opportunities. Not the same as majority opinion. You can always look it up.

[Fort Myers]

writewingproxycontin wrote:

<quoted text>
I never said anything about per capita.

Of course not. That's because per capita statistics PROVES that AIDS is a gay disease which trumps your case.

Africa does not report on homo/hetero so their data is useless.

You lose, homo.

[1noteasilyfooled]

Fort Myers wrote:

I am a homo.

Your correct! And a moron.. neither is exclusive.

[Frank]

Roku Roku Roku wrote:

<quoted text>Equality means the state of being equal, esp. in status, rights and opportunities. Not the same as majority opinion. You can always look it up.

So if we are all equal in rights, they you have no 'right' to undemocratically force your contrived philosophy of homosexual "marriage" on an unwilling nation. Got it?

It is ludicrous to claim that a homosexual relationshit is "the same thing" as a marriage! Such relationshits share NONE of the reasons for government involvement in marriage.

They are rare not nearly universal as marriage. They NEVER produce children as a direct result.

They can't provide children with a mother and father, one of the best statistical indicators of a child's future success.

They will NEVER be a basic building block of American Society.

They are not considered moral or positive by most Americans.

[Fort Myers]

1noteasilyfooled wrote:

<quoted text>I like to play with and eat my own poop!

I did not need to know that.

[gracie935]

Burn, California, burrrrrnnn! Just like Sodom and Gomorrah!
This country needs a federal marriage amendment and it should have happened years ago before liberal activist judges made the decision to over rule the will of the people. Now it will take a federal marriage amendment to overturn the idiotic decision of the liberal judges in California and Massachusettes. The majority of Americans do not support gay marriage and that has already been established by all the states that voted to ban gay marriage.